United States | Fertile ground

Will IVF really be the next frontier in America’s culture wars? 

Banning it would be political suicide. But it could get harder to find in conservative states

A rally in support of in vitro fertilization in Alabama, USA
Don’t mess with these peoplePhotograph: Charity Rachelle/The New York Times/Redux/Eyevine
|WASHINGTON, DC

Moral inconsistency is a pretty normal part of the human condition. Attitudes to in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) are a case in point. While the vast majority of Americans support access to the technology, which now accounts for over 90,000 births per year, many struggle with a key component of it: the destruction of embryos in the process. Indeed, whereas 82% of Americans believe IVF is morally acceptable, only 49% say the same about destroying excess embryos, according to recent polling by Gallup. This presents moral purists with a conundrum.

Explore more

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Fertile ground”

No way to run a country

From the July 6th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

The demise of an iconic American highway

California’s Highway 1 is showing the limits of man’s ingenuity

How the election will shape the Supreme Court

A second Trump administration could lock in a conservative supermajority for decades


Could the Kamala Harris boost put Florida in play for Democrats?

Some party enthusiasts think so, but realists see re-energised campaigning there as a savvy Florida feint


America is not ready for a major war, says a bipartisan commission

The country is unaware of the dangers ahead, and of the costs to prepare for them

The southern border is Kamala Harris’s biggest political liability

What does her record reveal about her immigration policy?