Julian Assange’s plea deal: a suitable end to a grubby saga
America was right to have sought his extradition. But a bit of compassion now does not go amiss
WHEN an unwanted house guest finally departs, the relief is palpable. So it is with the news that Julian Assange has left Britain. On June 24th the founder of WikiLeaks, a website that publishes classified and sensitive information, walked out of Belmarsh, a high-security prison in south-east London where he has spent the past five years, and hopped on a plane to Thailand. From there he flew to the Northern Mariana Islands, an American territory in the Pacific, where he pleaded guilty to one charge of violating America’s espionage laws. That fulfilled his side of a deal with the American government, which in return allowed him to go home to Australia. On June 26th he landed in Canberra, a free man.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Hero, villain, house guest”
Britain June 29th 2024
- What the remaking of Labour reveals about Sir Keir Starmer
- The Economist’s final prediction points to a Tory wipeout in Britain
- On shame, Liz Truss and the turnip Taliban
- The British election is not close. But the race in Bicester is
- The cost of Britain’s cast of ex-prime ministers is mounting
- Julian Assange’s plea deal: a suitable end to a grubby saga
- Why the next Westminster scandal is already here
From the June 29th 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Britain
The race to become leader of Britain’s Conservatives
An exhausted party seems to think that it doesn’t have to change
How deep is Britain’s fiscal “black hole”?
Rachel Reeves sets out her first big decisions as chancellor
Shabana Mahmood, Britain’s new Lord Chancellor
The new justice secretary is both progressive and religious
How King Charles III counts his swans
A ritual that pleases conservationists and annoys the birds
Britain’s army chief fears war may come sooner than anyone thinks
Could the army cope without more money and troops?