Leaders | The Middle East on fire

Israel should not rush to strike back at Iran

Instead it should try a novel response to Iran’s missile attack: restraint

A photo collage of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Benjamin Netanyahu.
Illustration: The Economist/Getty Images

The war cabinet in Israel is grappling with a perilous decision: how to respond to Iran’s unprecedented drone and missile attack on April 13th. The barrage was, fortunately, blocked with help from friends and neighbours. Should Israel “take the win”, as President Joe Biden is urging, letting a blatant act of war go unanswered? Or should it retaliate and risk sparking a regional conflagration?

A small country with many enemies, Israel has long prized massive—some would say disproportionate—deterrence. It has wrecked Gaza in the attempt to crush Hamas, which massacred Israeli civilians on October 7th. Israeli retribution against Iran now seems inevitable. But Israel’s government should stay its hand.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Don’t rush to retaliate”

Reasons to be cheerful about Generation Z

From the April 20th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

Germany’s failure to lead the EU is becoming a problem

A weak chancellor and coalition rows are to blame

How to ensure Africa is not left behind by the AI revolution

Weak digital infrastructure is holding the continent back


A global gold rush is changing sport

Fans may be cooling on the Olympics, but elsewhere technology is transforming how sport is watched


Can Kamala Harris win?

Joe Biden’s vice-president has an extraordinary opportunity. But she also has a mountain to climb

MAGA Republicans are wrong to seek a cheaper dollar

It is hard to cast America as a victim of the global financial system

Joe Biden has given Democrats a second chance to win the White House

If they are not to squander it, they must have a proper contest