Britain | Labour and the world

What does Labour’s win mean for British foreign policy?

Continuity on NATO and Ukraine, and hopes for a reset with Europe

President Jo Biden and Prime Minister Keir Starmer
Photograph: AP

SIR KEIR STARMER enjoyed many strokes of luck en route to becoming Britain’s prime minister on July 5th. The diary of diplomacy has handed him two more. On July 9th Sir Keir and some of his most senior ministers left for a summit in Washington, DC, to mark NATO’s 75th anniversary. And on July 18th, just a fortnight into the job, Sir Keir will host a meeting of the European Political Community (EPC), a loose gathering of states in and around the European Union, at Blenheim Palace, a vast Baroque edifice where Winston Churchill was born.

These two events, and the EPC in particular, will give the new Labour government an immediate stage to signal where Britain’s foreign policy will stay the same and where it will shift. They will also reinforce the biggest change of all, to the country’s reputation. Almost overnight an exaggerated image of Britain as a chaotic clown-show—true under Boris Johnson, a bit less so for Rishi Sunak—has flipped to an idealised image of stable government led by a serious-minded centrist.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Labour and the world”

How to raise the world’s IQ

From the July 13th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Britain

Labour sweet-talks the public sector

The race to become leader of Britain’s Conservatives

An exhausted party seems to think that it doesn’t have to change


How deep is Britain’s fiscal “black hole”?

Rachel Reeves sets out her first big decisions as chancellor


Shabana Mahmood, Britain’s new Lord Chancellor

The new justice secretary is both progressive and religious

How King Charles III counts his swans

A ritual that pleases conservationists and annoys the birds

Britain’s army chief fears war may come sooner than anyone thinks

Could the army cope without more money and troops?