The Nobel prize in economics rewards advances in auction theory
For the third time since 2007, it goes to designers of market mechanisms
IN 1991 ALVIN ROTH, who in 2012 would share the Nobel prize for economics, was asked how the discipline might change over the century to come. “In the long term”, he wrote, “the real test of our success will be not merely how well we understand the general principles which govern economic interactions, but how well we can bring this knowledge to bear on practical questions of microeconomic engineering.” Sweden’s Royal Academy of Science seems to agree. On October 12th it gave this year’s Nobel prize to Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson, both of Stanford University, for their work on auction theory and design. Their work epitomises economics as engineering.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Winning bids”
Finance & economics October 17th 2020
- The Nobel prize in economics rewards advances in auction theory
- Can China’s reported growth be trusted?
- Wall Street says it is braced for losses. Now what?
- Low interest rates leave savers with few good options
- Why securing debt forgiveness for poor countries is so hard
- The IMF predicts that the world economy will suffer from “long covid”
- The tale of Iran’s stockmarket bubble is familiar—but also strange
More from Finance and economics
China’s last boomtowns show rapid growth is still possible
All it takes is for the state to work with the market
What the war on tourism gets wrong
Visitors are a boon, if managed wisely
Why investors are unwise to bet on elections
Turning a profit from political news is a lot harder than it looks
Revisiting the work of Donald Harris, father of Kamala
The combative Marxist economist focused on questions related to growth
Donald Trump wants a weaker dollar. What are his options?
All come with their own drawbacks
Why is Xi Jinping building secret commodity stockpiles?
Vast new holdings of grain, natural gas and oil suggest trouble ahead