Finance and economics | Sweet gains, bro

America’s rich never sell their assets. How should they be taxed? 

It is tempting to tax them during their lives. It is wiser to do so after their deaths 

Private jets are seen on the tarmac at Friedman Memorial Airport.
Photograph: Getty Images
|Washington, DC

Editor’s note (June 20th 2024): The Supreme Court has ruled in Moore v United States, upholding the tax at issue (the “mandatory repatriation tax”). The court declined to weigh in on the constitutionality of a tax on unrealised gains.

What is income, really? Ask an economist and they might describe “Haig-Simons” income—the value of a person’s consumption of goods and services, plus the change in their net worth over a certain period. A lawyer might refer to Section 61(a) of the IRS Code 26, which defines “gross” income as “all income from whatever source derived”, including but not limited to commission, interest, property deals and wages. An accountant might talk about how to reduce that gross income, via deductions or carve-outs, to a skinnier “taxable income base”.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Sweet gains, bro”

Dawn of the solar age

From the June 22nd 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

China’s last boomtowns show rapid growth is still possible

All it takes is for the state to work with the market

What the war on tourism gets wrong

Visitors are a boon, if managed wisely


Why investors are unwise to bet on elections

Turning a profit from political news is a lot harder than it looks


Revisiting the work of Donald Harris, father of Kamala

The combative Marxist economist focused on questions related to growth

Why is Xi Jinping building secret commodity stockpiles?

Vast new holdings of grain, natural gas and oil suggest trouble ahead