The meaning of Donald Trump’s Supreme Court victory
His lawyers’ attempt to delay the election-subversion case worked
IN DECEMBER JACK SMITH tried to get the Supreme Court to quickly take up the question of whether Donald Trump was immune from prosecution for allegedly attempting to subvert the results of the election in 2020. The charges, wrote the special counsel (an independent prosecutor appointed by the Department of Justice), “implicate a central tenet of our democracy”. The justices’ prompt resolution was necessary to “permit the trial to occur on an appropriate timetable”. He must have known it was a long shot.
Explore more
More from United States
The demise of an iconic American highway
California’s Highway 1 is showing the limits of man’s ingenuity
How the election will shape the Supreme Court
A second Trump administration could lock in a conservative supermajority for decades
Could the Kamala Harris boost put Florida in play for Democrats?
Some party enthusiasts think so, but realists see re-energised campaigning there as a savvy Florida feint
America is not ready for a major war, says a bipartisan commission
The country is unaware of the dangers ahead, and of the costs to prepare for them
The southern border is Kamala Harris’s biggest political liability
What does her record reveal about her immigration policy?