What is “Finlandisation”?
An unpleasant cold-war arrangement is contemplated for Ukraine
THE CRISIS over Ukraine has pushed desperate officials in Western capitals to seek a diplomatic way to avert a Russian invasion. On his way to a meeting with Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, in Moscow, Emmanuel Macron, his French counterpart, was asked about one possible solution: “Finlandisation”, a reference to Finland’s officially neutral status during the cold war. It was “one model on the table”, acknowledged Mr Macron, but he insisted diplomats would have to invent something new. The news sparked anger in Ukraine and also in Finland, where the experience is not remembered fondly. How did “Finlandisation” work in practice, and how might a similar status be applied to Ukraine?
More from The Economist explains
Who are the Druze, the victims of a deadly strike on Israel?
The religious minority has often been caught up in regional crossfire in the Middle East
Myanmar’s rapidly changing civil war, in maps and charts
Ethnic militias and pro-democracy groups are scoring victories against the governing junta
Who will be Kamala Harris’s running-mate?
She is reportedly vetting a dozen options. These are the top three
Why have so few American presidents been from the West?
Kamala Harris’s nomination would be a milestone for the region
Why the Olympics still has a doping problem
Cheating with drugs has again become an organised affair
Why some Russian athletes will be eligible to compete at the Paris Olympics
Despite antipathy between the Russian government and the International Olympic Committee a handful will compete