Does the First Amendment apply to public-access cable?
The Supreme Court asks whether a New York City network is a “state actor”
By S.M. | NEW YORK
FREEDOM OF SPEECH, one of the five rights enshrined in the First Amendment, offers little solace to people silenced by private entities. If an arm of the government is suppressing your speech—on a street corner or in a school, say—you are protected. But a company, club or newspaper unaffiliated with the government has no obligation to let you speak; they can curate ideas within their walls or pages however they like. The line between spaces where free speech is a constitutional right and where it is not is to an extent clearly defined, but there are some venues where an otherwise private entity behaves like a state or acts as an agent of the government. One such arena posed a conundrum for the Supreme Court on February 25th, when the justices heard Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck.
More from Democracy in America
The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue
Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses
The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump
Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president
A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map
The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020
A soldier’s word against Donald Trump’s in impeachment inquiry
Testimony from Alexander Vindman, a decorated veteran, is hard to trash as partisan sniping
Why Democrats are talking about Tulsi Gabbard
The low-polling presidential candidate has caused a stir
Americans’ views on impeachment mirror the president’s approval ratings
The current depths of partisanship are unprecedented