Democracy in America | Testing the boundaries

Does the First Amendment apply to public-access cable?

The Supreme Court asks whether a New York City network is a “state actor”

By S.M. | NEW YORK

FREEDOM OF SPEECH, one of the five rights enshrined in the First Amendment, offers little solace to people silenced by private entities. If an arm of the government is suppressing your speech—on a street corner or in a school, say—you are protected. But a company, club or newspaper unaffiliated with the government has no obligation to let you speak; they can curate ideas within their walls or pages however they like. The line between spaces where free speech is a constitutional right and where it is not is to an extent clearly defined, but there are some venues where an otherwise private entity behaves like a state or acts as an agent of the government. One such arena posed a conundrum for the Supreme Court on February 25th, when the justices heard Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck.

More from Democracy in America

The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue

Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses

The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump

Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president


A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map

The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020


A soldier’s word against Donald Trump’s in impeachment inquiry

Testimony from Alexander Vindman, a decorated veteran, is hard to trash as partisan sniping

Why Democrats are talking about Tulsi Gabbard

The low-polling presidential candidate has caused a stir

Americans’ views on impeachment mirror the president’s approval ratings

The current depths of partisanship are unprecedented